Applications .

Built here. Running in the field.

Each example is one decision. The system surfaced it; a person made the call. The first three are real, with the client anonymized and every figure changed. The rest are illustrative.

Discuss a build

M&A integration/Workforce plan/Post-close

The plan counted 1,210 exits toward synergy. HR had notified 100.

EXITS WITH NO BACKFILL, PEOPLE In the planNotifiedLeft early 1,210100~1,100 Imported from one exit label. Told by HR. These carry the synergy. Before close, or resigned. Part of a $960K gap. 04008001,200 HR lead: still exits, out of synergy.
The callHR lead
Kept every exit on the books, took the people who left before close out of synergy, and reviewed each suspected resignation one by one.
Why a person
The import read one exit label the same way every time. The HR lead knew who had actually been told.

M&A integration/Reporting lines/46,346 people

The ID says one manager. The name says another. 148 times.

WRONG MANAGER, AGAINST KNOWN ANSWERS WRONG Country onlyName distanceID and name agree 9%99%0 300/3,374314/318 Fills the line. Wrong about 1 time in 11. Fills the line. Almost always wrong. 148 disputed lines held, nothing guessed. 050%100% HR lead confirms all 148.
The callHR lead
Held all 148 on the current manager until each was confirmed. Six lines stay open rather than carry a guess.
Why a person
A looser rule would fill every line. Tested against known answers, it picked the wrong manager 300 times in 3,374.

HR assistant/968 policy documents/Europe

The rule said any pay figure was a leak. That would have cut 88 benefit policies.

EUROPEAN HR POLICY LIBRARY, DOCUMENTS 930grounded out38 KIND OF PAY FIGURE WAS NOW Benefit amounts, 88 docsEuropean base payIncentive and deal pay outoutout ininout Confidential pay out. General policy in.
The callEngagement lead
Kept confidential pay out and let general policy in: award tables, allowance caps, and European base pay. 930 of 968 documents in.
Why a person
A keyword scan finds numbers. It can't tell a glasses allowance from a bonus plan.

M&A integration/Year 2 post-close

The board heard $140M. Operations could defend $96M.

YEAR-2 RUN-RATE, $M 96.4secured target140.0 Realized 71.2 Notified 15.4 Planned 9.8 GAP BY WAVE, $M Wave 3procurement 24.0 no owner Wave 4footprint 19.6 no owner Out of guidance until each wave has an owner.
Illustrative
The callCFO
Guided the board to the defended number, then put a name on waves 3 and 4 before counting either.
Why a person
A board forgives a smaller number. It doesn't forgive a missed one.

FP&A/$462M plan/Month 3

The forecast says $3.2M favorable. One line says otherwise.

FORECAST VS PLAN, BY SUB-FUNCTION People operationsTotal rewards Talent & learningHR technology Shared servicesField HR -1.2+0.8-1.0 +5.8 -1.4-1.6 -2%0+2%+5% Dual-run licenses, 2 months over. Cut over by month 6.
Illustrative
The callVP Finance
Kept the forecast, set a hard cut-over date for HR technology, and wrote down the fallback if it slips.
Why a person
Only the owner knew the vendor would accept a firm date.

Separation/34 service agreements/Day 212

Payroll exits in 34 days. The parallel run hasn't started.

DAYS TO CONTRACTUAL EXIT CRITERIA Payroll processingIT service desk Order to cashData center hosting Accounts payableBenefits admin 34d61d88d 92d124d171d 4/93/87/11 5/89/108/8 060120180 Extend 60 days.
Illustrative
The callIntegration lead
Extended the payroll agreement 60 days at a known cost of $388K a month instead of cutting over blind.
Why a person
The model priced the extension. It couldn't price a missed paycheck.

Org design/12,847 people/41 countries

Folding layer L8 saves $12.3M. 212 of those roles run plant safety.

SAVING BY OPTION, $M ROLES OUT Leave L8Fold L8 everywhereFold in field ops 012.37.5 07446 Outside the peer band of 6 to 8. 212 plant supervisors lose their safety span. No flag. The plants keep L8. 051015 COO: fold in field ops. Plants keep L8.
Illustrative
The callCOO
Folded L8 in field operations and kept it in the plants: $7.5M instead of $12.3M, with every site safety span intact.
Why a person
The model priced all three options in a second. Choosing took someone who knew what a plant supervisor is for.

Talent risk/4,212 assessed/Cycle 2026-H1

57 key people hold $31.0M of exposure. The riskiest has no successor.

KEY-PERSON EXPOSURE, $M SUCCESSOR Site quality directorPrincipal process engineer Regional sales leadFormulation leadField service manager 4.12.82.21.71.5 none2027namednamed2027 024 Talk first. Fund the successor.
Illustrative
The callCHRO
Met the site quality director before approving the retention award. The move was family, not money, so the budget went to readying a successor.
Why a person
A retention model scores flight risk. It can't hear why someone is leaving.

Utilization review/148 in queue/32 due today

Fourteen days of inpatient rehab requested. Two of four criteria are clean.

UR-8829 / INPATIENT REHAB / 14 DAYS REQUESTED NOTES Three hours of therapy a dayMedically stable for transfer Measurable gain in 14 daysNeeds this level of care MetMetPartialNot scored 2110 SYSTEM Route to clinical judgment Therapy notes read. Approve 7 days, review day 5.
Illustrative
The callPhysician reviewer
Approved seven days with a concurrent review on day five, after reading the therapy notes the criteria don't score.
Why a person
The criteria score what's documented. A physician reads the rest of the chart.

Clinical development/2,847 tracked trials/Q3 review

A rival mRNA trial paused enrollment at 96 of 260. Is the window opening?

ENROLLED OF TARGET, TRACKED TRIALS STATUS Solid tumor, 2LMelanoma, adj. Atopic dermatitisIgA nephropathyNSCLC, adj. 3128761,10440296 / 400/ 1,089/ 1,300/ 480/ 260 openopenopenopenpaused A protocol amendment, not a stall. Timeline holds.
Illustrative
The callDevelopment lead
Held the Phase 2 timeline and read the eight sources before the review. The pause was a protocol amendment, not a stall.
Why a person
The model sees a paused trial. Someone who runs trials knows what an amendment looks like.

Portfolio/$46.8M in assets/IC month-end

One name sits at 84% of its limit, and earnings are in two weeks.

LIMIT USE VS POLICY VAR, $K limit US equityCreditRates Real assetsSingle name 71%58%44% 39%84% 21896543831 Trim to 3.5% before earnings. Buy-back level set.
Illustrative
The callCIO
Trimmed it to 3.5% ahead of earnings instead of waiting for the limit, and wrote down the price to buy back at.
Why a person
A limit says how much is allowed. It doesn't say how much conviction is worth.

Condition monitoring/412 assets/8 sites

Two pumps at one site share a bearing-fault signature.

OVERALL VELOCITY, MM/S RMS SIGNATURE alarm 7.1 Transfer pumpScrew compressorAir handling fan Charge pumpAgitator gearbox P-1104AC-0407 9.47.85.1 4.62.9 BPFOBPFO Same bearing lot. Inspect it, hold to the stop.
Illustrative
The callReliability engineer
Kept both pumps to the planned stop on daily readings, and pulled every bearing from the same supplier lot for inspection.
Why a person
The model matched the signature. The engineer recognized the lot number.
Sectors
process engineering . pharma & bio-pharma . healthcare . asset management . manufacturing
Functions
human capital . finance . operations . consulting . program & project management . machine intelligence

Discuss a build like this